tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24998935.post2623394636443969716..comments2023-10-18T01:40:21.059-06:00Comments on Lee Distad's professional opinion: Samsung's Circuit City Losses Covered? Hard To BelieveLee_Dhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01883046714531709404noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24998935.post-51810986057790718662008-11-12T09:18:00.000-07:002008-11-12T09:18:00.000-07:00"Samsung won't suffer any losses."I guess the dama..."Samsung won't suffer any losses."<BR/><BR/>I guess the damage to their reputation doesn't count. Nor will the marketplace chaos of having a liquidation receiver dumping $116 mil of inventory cause any loss to Samsung's dealer network. Nor will the inevitable warranty hassles that consumers will face after buying product from warehouse clearance sites that won't even give a customer the time of day hurt Samsung. Nor will cleaning up the stain in the boardroom after the insurance rep commits seppuku after delivering the settlement cheque cause any "loss". Not to mention I can't imagine what Samsung's insurance premiums will look like for the next decade.<BR/><BR/>Nope, no losses at ALL!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04224790812997190731noreply@blogger.com